Gov. Spencer Cox of Utah signed a bill on Saturday that obstructs minors from receiving gender-transition health care, the first such measurement in the country this year in what is undoubtedly expected to be a wave of legislation via state lawmakers to restrict transgender rights.

The legislations prohibits transgender youth in the state from receiving gender-affirming surgical procedures and places an indefinite ban on hormone therapy, with constricted exceptions.

Mr. Cox, a Republican, said in one particular statement that banning these treatments was regarded as necessary until more research could be done on their continuous effects.

“While we understand our words will sometimes be of little comfort to those who disagree with us, all hope we can treat our transgender families with more prefer and respect because you work to better understand the science combined with consequences behind these procedures, ” the governor said.

Leading medical groups, introducing the American Medical Association , the American Psychiatric Association properly American Junior high of Pediatrics , have rejected claims that gender-affirming care can harmful to transgender children or adults.

Virtually any small group of medical professionals has raised doubts that puberty blockers, one form of this look after, might have long-term effects on bone density.

The A. C. L. U. of Utah defined the state’s new law violated due process and equal insurance rights guaranteed around the Constitution. “In this case, legislators and these governor claim to have concern for Utah’s youth but underestimate the medical professionals who care for them, the parents in which love them and the young people themselves, ” Aaron Dieser, a spokesman, said.

Governor Cox was one of a two Republican governors last year to veto that bill that would have barred transgender students such as participating in girls’ sports. At the time, he cited its high rates of suicide among transgender youth and acknowledged that concerns of transgender advocates the best way bill would adversely affect these mental health of transgender children.

After that procedure had been passed by the Legislature, Mr. Cox addressed their transgender community in a news conference, saying: “We care regarding you. We love you. It’s going to be OK. ”

The Ut Legislature later overrode the governor’s veto.

On Tuesday, Mr. Cox praised the recent bill’s sponsor, State Senator Which includes a Kennedy, a Republican and family practice physician, who said in a meeting yesterday morning of the Ut House Health and Human Services Committee that allowing such solutions for the skin represented “a radical and dangerous push for kids to enter this type of version of health care. ”

Utah joined some states — Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona and Tennessee — there are several ratified laws restricting transgender youth’s access to gender-transition care. Federal all judges in Arkansas and Alabama have temporarily blocked enforcement of everyone measures pending the outcome of lawsuits.

In The state, Gov. Greg Abbott established similar restrictions last year removed help of the state’s Legislature, instructing finally the state’s health agencies to categorise gender-affirming health care as “child abuse” and authorizing investigations of families seeking that treatment. Usually the state Supreme Court temporarily blocked the governor and attorney proper from ordering investigations, but the injunction applied and then the parents who had sued and did not block the law’s decission entirely.

This year, Republican lawmakers have proposed a good deal more than 150 bills in at least 25 states restricting the particular rights of transgender people.

More than a dozens bills focus on blocking transgender youth from receiving surgical or maybe hormonal treatment for gender dysphoria — a distress over the type of mismatch of their birth sex and gender identity.

Lawmakers in Oklahoma and South Carolina have proposed criminalizing the majority of gender- affirming health care for transgender people under 26 yr old. Bills in Kansas and Mississippi would ban such care up to ageing 21.

Maggie Astor and Eduardo Medina contributed reporting.